Measuring retirement resource adequacy
- 8 September 2008
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Pension Economics and Finance
- Vol. 9 (2) , 235-262
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747208003806
Abstract
To maintain their standard of living during retirement, it is often assumed that individuals need to save enough to replace 75–80% of their final pay. This paper develops a replacement rate measure that better corresponds with a replacement of consumption by properly accounting for savings, taxes, and owner-occupied housing. Savings and investment behavior judged by standard analysis to be inadequate is shown to result in high real consumption during retirement relative to pre-retirement consumption. For example, the simulated savings and investment behavior of single individuals in this study results in retirement income of about 60% of final earnings, well below the typical adequacy threshold of 75–80%. However, this corresponds to replacing about 90% of pre-retirement consumption for renters and over 100% for homeowners who have paid off their mortgage.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Americans Saving “Optimally” for Retirement?Journal of Political Economy, 2006
- Social Security Replacement Rates for Alternative Earnings BenchmarksSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Winners and Losers under Various Approaches to Slowing Social Security Benefit GrowthNational Tax Journal, 2005
- Lifetime Earnings, Social Security Benefits, and the Adequacy of Retirement Wealth AccumulationSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Can Americans Afford to Retire? New Evidence on Retirement Saving AdequacyJournal of Risk and Insurance, 1998
- Public Policy and Saving in the United States and CanadaCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1997
- Aging and the income value of housing wealthJournal of Public Economics, 1991