Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test?: The endocervical component
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diagnostic Cytopathology
- Vol. 23 (1) , 23-26
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:1<23::aid-dc5>3.0.co;2-k
Abstract
The ThinPrep Pap Test (Cyryc Corp., Boxborough, MA) has proven to be effective in decreasing the number of cervical specimens limited for interpretation by blood/inflammatory exudate as compared to conventional smears. However, its effectiveness in decreasing the number of preparations which lack an endocervical component is less well-established. The purpose of this 1-yr study (January 1998-December 1998) was to determine if the collecting instruments used by physicians played a role in the lack of an endocervical component on ThinPrep slides. On implementation of the ThinPrep Pap Test for cervical cytology, the broom-type sampling device (Papette, Wallach Surgical Devices, Inc., Millford, CT) was the FDA-approved collecting instrument. Subsequently the combined plastic spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush (Medscand, Inc., Hollywood, FL) were approved. A survey was sent to 102 physicians in seven primarY care sites and two private obstetrics-gynecology practices affiliated with the Loyola University Health Care System. One site used the broom only, one site used the spatula/cytobrush, five sites used the broom/cytobrush, and in two sites, two different sets of collecting instruments were utilized. Of the 10,241 ThinPrep samples, 620 (6%) were obtained with the broom only, 432 (4.3%) with the spatula/cytobrush, and 9,189 (89.7%) with the broom/cytobrush. An endocervical component was absent in 24% (range, 13.7-25%) of the cervical samples collected with the broom only, 10% (range, 8.4-12.5%) with the spatula/cytobrush, and 13% (range, 6.2-18.8%) with the broom/ cytobrush. The spatula/cytobrush and the broom/cytobrush showed statistical significance (P < 0.001) over the broom alone in the collection of an endocervical component. The results of this study indicate that the collecting instruments used by the physician(s) played a role in the adequacy (endocervical component) of the specimen processed by the ThinPrep method. Diagn. CytoKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system.Acta Cytologica, 1998
- Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap Test in Clinical PracticeActa Cytologica, 1998
- Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screeningObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Specimen Adequacy of ThinPrep Sample Preparations in a Direct-to-Vial StudyActa Cytologica, 1997
- Efficacy of thinprep® preparation of cervical smears: A 1,000-case, investigator-sponsored studyDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1994
- The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic DiagnosesPublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- Rates of condyloma and dysplasia in papanicolaou smears with and without endocervical cellsDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1990
- INDICATORS OF EFFECTIVE CYTOLOGICAL SAMPLING OF THE UTERINE CERVIXThe Lancet, 1989
- False negative rate in cervical cytology.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1987
- Influence of cell collection techniques upon cytological diagnosisCancer, 1965