Net Health Plan Savings From Reference Pricing for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Elderly British Columbia Residents
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 42 (7) , 653-660
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000129497.10930.a2
Abstract
Reference drug pricing (RP) is a cost-sharing strategy commonly used to control drug expenditures. Under RP, a benefit plan fully reimburses medications that are equally or less expensive than the reference price, and requires patients to pay the extra cost of therapeutically equivalent but higher priced drugs. Critics argued that drug plan savings are offset by administrative costs and increased spending on other health services. We evaluated net healthcare savings in beneficiaries ≥65 years from the perspective of the British Columbia provincial health insurance system after it applied RP to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in 1997. We estimated savings in new users of antihypertensives after the start of RP plus associated administrative costs and savings from reductions in retail drug prices. Findings were integrated with earlier results on the consequences of RP on expenditures for drugs, physicians, and hospitalizations among all seniors who used ACE inhibitors before the introduction of RP. During the first year after the implementation of RP, savings for continuous users were CAN $6.0 million. Savings for new users were $0.2 million. Approximately five sixths thereof were achieved by utilization changes and one sixth by cost shifting to patients. There were no savings through drug price changes. Administering RP cost $0.42 million. Overall net savings were estimated to be $5.8 million during the first year after the start of RP. The magnitude of these savings is equal to 6% of all cardiovascular drug expenditures in seniors. After 10 years, approximately 50% of savings will be achieved by new users. We observed substantial net savings from RP for ACE inhibitors for the provincial health insurance system in British Columbia, although there were generous exemptions from the policy. In other jurisdictions, savings could be higher if drug prices decline after the start of reference pricing.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reference Pricing For Drugs: Is It Compatible With U.S. Health Care?Health Affairs, 2003
- Quantifying Components of Drug Expenditure Inflation: The British Columbia Seniors' Drug Benefit PlanHealth Services Research, 2002
- Quasi-experimental longitudinal designs to evaluate drug benefit policy changes with low policy complianceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2002
- Outcomes of Reference Pricing for Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme InhibitorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Prescription Duration After Drug Copay Changes in Older People: Methodological AspectsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2002
- When Is It Cost-effective to Change the Behavior of Health Professionals?JAMA, 2001
- On the evaluation of drug benefits policy changes with longitudinal claims data: the policy maker's versus the clinician's perspectiveHealth Policy, 2001
- The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit: How Will The Game Be Played?Health Affairs, 2000
- What is Germany's experience on reference based drug pricing and the etiology of adverse health outcomes or substitution?Health Policy, 1998
- Compliance with antihypertensive therapy among elderly Medicaid enrollees: the roles of age, gender, and race.American Journal of Public Health, 1996