Conceptual Differences in the Analysis of Stimulus Equivalence
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in The Psychological Record
- Vol. 49 (1) , 145-161
- https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395312
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- ANALYZING DERIVED STIMULUS RELATIONS REQUIRES MORE THAN THE CONCEPT OF STIMULUS CLASSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1997
- IN PURSUIT OF GENERAL BEHAVIORAL RELATIONSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1996
- LISTENING WITH UNDERSTANDING AND SPEAKING WITH MEANINGJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1996
- NAMING, STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE, AND CONDITIONED HEARINGJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1996
- NAMING AS A TECHNICAL TERM: SACRIFICING BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS AT THE ALTAR OF POPULARITY?Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1996
- THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUNCTIONAL AND EQUIVALENCE CLASSES IN HIGH‐FUNCTIONING AUTISTIC CHILDREN: THE ROLE OF NAMINGJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1992
- USING STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE PROCEDURES TO TEACH NAME-FACE MATCHING TO ADULTS WITH BRAIN INJURIESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992
- Unimpaired Short-term Memory and Rhyme Judgement in Congenitally Speechless Individuals: Implications for the Notion of “Articulatory Coding”The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1989
- EQUIVALENCE CLASS FORMATION IN LANGUAGE‐ABLE AND LANGUAGE‐DISABLED CHILDRENJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1986
- Behaviorism at FiftyScience, 1963