The Effectiveness of a Needleless Intravenous Connection System: An Assessment by Injury Rate and User Satisfaction
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 18 (3) , 175-182
- https://doi.org/10.2307/30141978
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of a needleless intravenous (IV) connection system on the rate of reported intravenous-connection-related (IVCR) percutaneous injuries, and to assess user satisfaction, frequency of use, and barriers to use. Design: A pre-post intervention Design, with injury incidence rates being compared 3 years before and 1 year after hospitalwide device implementation; and a crosssectional descriptive user satisfaction survey. Setting: Two tertiary-care teaching hospitals, one general and one pediatric, located in a large metropolitan medical center. Outcome variable: All IVCR percutaneous injuries reported to the employee health services at both hospitals during the years from 1989 to 1991 and 1993. Study population: Survey Participants were selected randomly from licensed nursing employees at both hospitals. Intervention: IV connection system consisting of blunt plastic cannulas and compressed latex injection sites. Results: After device implementation, the IVCR injury rate was reduced 62.4% (rate ratio [RR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [$CI_{95}$], 0.27-0.53) at the general hospital and 70.2% (RR, 0.30; $CI_{95}$, 0.17-0.53) at the pediatric hospital. After adjusting for thie reduction in injury rate due to factors other than device implementation, the IVCR injury rate was reduced 54.5% (adjusted RR, 0.46; $CI_{95}$, 0.32-0.65) at the general hospital and 57.2% (adjusted RR, 0.43; $CI_{95}$, 0.24-0.78) at the pediatric hospital. Approximately 94% of survey respondents (n=478, response rate=51%) were satisfied with the device and recommended continued use. However, needles still were being used for activities that could have been performed with the needleless system because of compatibility, accessibility, and other technical problems related to the device. Conclusions: The device was effective in reducing the rate of reported IVCR percutaneous injuries and users were satisfied with the device, but barriers to universal use were identified.
Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Five-Year Study of Needlestick Injuries: Significant Reduction Associated with Communication, Education, and Convenient Placement of Sharps ContainersInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1992
- Epidemiology of hospital sharps injuries: A 14-year prospective study in the pre-AIDS and AIDS erasThe American Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Effect of Educational Programs, Rigid Sharps Containers, and Universal Precautions on Reported Needlestick Injuries in Healthcare WorkersInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1991
- Universal Precautions: Still Missing the Point on NeedlesticksInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1991
- Surveillance of Health Care Workers Exposed to Blood from Patients Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency VirusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Rates of Needle-Stick Injury Caused by Various Devices in a University HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Effect of Bedside Needle Disposal Units on Needle Recapping Frequency and Needlestick InjuryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1988
- Effect of Changing Needle Disposal Systems on Needle Puncture InjuriesInfection Control, 1987
- Impact of a Rigid, Puncture Resistant Container System Upon Needlestick InjuriesInfection Control, 1987
- Epidemiology of needle-stick injuries in hospital personnelThe American Journal of Medicine, 1981