The potential value of indels as phylogenetic markers: position of trichomonads as a case study.
Open Access
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 19 (6) , 972-977
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004156
Abstract
The phylogeny of eukaryotes is in a state of flux (Philippe, Germot, and Moreira 2000 ). The tree based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA, for long taken as a reference, has been challenged by the discovery of serious tree reconstruction artifacts, especially the long-branch attraction (LBA) (Felsenstein 1978 ). To eschew these methodological issues, one can improve tree reconstruction methods, especially through the implementation of more realistic models of sequence evolution, which we have called the statistical approach (Philippe and Laurent 1998 ). However, it is also possible to use the hennigian approach, i.e., the maximum parsimony method applied to less noisy characters, which are a priori not prone to convergence and reversion and thus less homoplastic. As recently reviewed (Rokas and Holland 2000 ), rare genomic changes (RGCs), like intron positions, retrotransposon insertions, insertions-deletions (known as indels), mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genetic code variants, chloroplastic and mitochondrial DNA gene orders gave several interesting results.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lateral transfer at the gene and subgenic levels in the evolution of eukaryotic enolaseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Nuclear-Encoded, Plastid-Targeted Genes Suggest a Single Common Origin for Apicomplexan and Dinoflagellate PlastidsMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2001
- Enolase from Trypanosoma brucei, from the Amitochondriate Protist Mastigamoeba balamuthi, and from the Chloroplast and Cytosol of Euglena gracilis: Pieces in the Evolutionary Puzzle of the Eukaryotic Glycolytic PathwayMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2000
- Early–branching or fast–evolving eukaryotes? An answer based on slowly evolving positionsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- Mitochondrial Genome Evolution and the Origin of EukaryotesAnnual Review of Genetics, 1999
- How good are deep phylogenetic trees?Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 1998
- Cloning, characterization and sequence comparison of the gene coding for IMP dehydrogenase from Pyrococcus furiosusGene, 1996
- Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplastsJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1990
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978