Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality.
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 17 (4) , 301-306
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012751326462
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Limitations of Sensitivity, Specificity, Likelihood Ratio, and Bayesʼ Theorem in Assessing Diagnostic ProbabilitiesEpidemiology, 1997
- Guidelines for the Assessment of New Diagnostic TestsInvestigative Radiology, 1995
- Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic testsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Workup Bias in Prediction ResearchMedical Decision Making, 1987
- Rethinking sensitivity and specificityThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Analysis of Probability as an Aid in the Clinical Diagnosis of Coronary-Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978