The Clinical Importance of the Rh Blood Type
- 19 April 1945
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 232 (16) , 447-450
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm194504192321603
Abstract
IN the five years that have elapsed since the Rh factor in human red cells — better known as the Rh blood type — was first discovered, there has been a steadily increasing volume of literature on this subject. In the past two years alone, more than two hundred such articles have appeared in medical journals. Many of these have been concerned with the laboratory aspects of Rh typing, Rh antiserums, nomenclature and the heredity of the possible subtypes of the Rh factor, thus suggesting to some physicians that this new field has in it relatively little of clinical value. . . .This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Isoimmunization with Rh Factor in Acquired Hemolytic AnemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1943
- The incidence of the RH factor and erythroblastosis fetalis in ChineseAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1943
- Heredity of the Rh factor1943
- Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions Due to the Rh Factor: A Preventable DangerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1942
- The Rh Factor and Racial OriginsScience, 1942
- DISTRIBUTION OF THE Rh FACTOR IN AMERICAN INDIANSThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1942
- The role of iso-immunization in the pathogenesis of erythroblastosis fetalisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1941
- STUDIES ON AN AGGLUTINOGEN (Rh) IN HUMAN BLOOD REACTING WITH ANTI-RHESUS SERA AND WITH HUMAN ISOANTIBODIESThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1941
- The Common Etiology of Erythroblastosis and Transfusion Accidents in Pregnancy**Read, in part, at a meeting of the Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Academy of Medicine, May 27, 1941.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1941
- HEMOLYTIC REACTIONS FOLLOWING TRANSFUSIONS OF BLOOD OF THE HOMOLOGOUS GROUP, WITH THREE CASES IN WHICH THE SAME AGGLUTINOGEN WAS RESPONSIBLEAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1940