Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 21 July 2001
- Vol. 323 (7305) , 131
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7305.131
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate quantitatively articles that compared effects of second and third generation oral contraceptives on risk of venous thrombosis. Design: Meta-analysis. Studies: Cohort and case-control studies assessing risk of venous thromboembolism among women using oral contraceptives before October 1995. Main outcome measures: Pooled adjusted odds ratios calculated by a general variance based random effects method. When possible, two by two tables were extracted and combined by the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: The overall adjusted odds ratio for third versus second generation oral contraceptives was 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 2.0; seven studies). Similar risks were found when oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene were compared with those containing levonorgestrel. Among first time users, the odds ratio for third versus second generation preparations was 3.1 (2.0 to 4.6; four studies). The odds ratio was 2.5 (1.6 to 4.1; five studies) for short term users compared with 2.0 (1.4 to 2.7; five studies) for longer term users. The odds ratio was 1.3 (1.0 to 1.7) in studies funded by the pharmaceutical industry and 2.3 (1.7 to 3.2) in other studies. Differences in age and certainty of diagnosis of venous thrombosis did not affect the results. Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the view that third generation oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with second generation oral contraceptives. The increase cannot be explained by several potential biases. What is already known on this topic Third generation oral contraceptives have been reported to increase the risk of venous thrombosis compared with second generation oral contraceptives The findings have been vigorously debated, with suggestions that the results can be explained by confounding or bias, or both. What this study adds Women taking third generation oral contraceptives have a 1.7-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with those taking second generation oral contraceptives Risk is highest in first time users The biases were not large enough to account for the observed resultsKeywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- A comparison of the risks of venous thromboembolic disease in association with different combined oral contraceptivesBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000
- New epidemiological studies. Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolic disease. Analyses of the UK General Practice Research Database and the UK MediPlus DatabaseHuman Reproduction Update, 1999
- Interpretations. Cardiovascular disease and combined oral contraceptives: reviewing the evidence and balancing the risksHuman Reproduction Update, 1999
- Interpretations. The aftermath of a pill scare: regression to reassuranceHuman Reproduction Update, 1999
- Venous thromboembolism amng new users of different oral contraceptives.The Lancet, 1999
- Resistance to activated protein C, highly prevalent amongst users of oral contraceptives with venous thromboembolismJournal of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel AntagonistsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Risk of idiopathic cardiovascular death and rionfatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with differing progestagen componentsThe Lancet, 1995
- Venous thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives: results of international multicentre case-control studyThe Lancet, 1995