Implementation of in-house developed vs application package based information systems
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1145/95367.95370
Abstract
Even though in-house development and the use of application packages form two major strategies for developing information systems, there is practically no research into the comparative implementability of information systems developed according to these strategies. The article suggests that the level or originality of information systems can be used as a theoretical concept underlying the dichotomy of in-house development vs. application packages, and puts forward a set of hypotheses regarding the influence of the level of originality on the implementability of information systems. The hypotheses form the theoretical basis for a comparison of the two types of information system development in terms of implementability, and clearly support Lynch's finding (Lynch, 1984) that the implementation of application packages is more difficult than one might initially expect.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- An innovation research perspective on information system implementationInternational Journal of Information Management, 1986
- Dimensions of information systems design: A framework for a long-range research programInformation Systems, 1986
- The control of information systems developments after implementationCommunications of the ACM, 1984
- An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectivesCommunications of the ACM, 1984
- Power, politics, and MIS implementationCommunications of the ACM, 1983
- Originality level and the innovating process in organizationsHuman Systems Management, 1982
- THE IRRATIONALITY OF ACTION AND ACTION RATIONALITY: DECISIONS, IDEOLOGIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONSJournal of Management Studies, 1982
- MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Part I: The CausesMIS Quarterly, 1977