Private Property versus Markets: Democratic and Communitarian Critiques of Capitalism
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 91 (2) , 277-289
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2952356
Abstract
This essay assesses communitarian and democratic critiques of capitalist economies. Distinguishing them are sharply contrasting evaluations of markets and private property. Communitarian critics of capitalism trace its moral failure to the marketplace. Drawing on Aristotle's normative economics, this school maintains that production for gain corrodes society's moral fabric. I defend the democratic approach. Democratic critics accept the modern claim that markets are both efficient and liberating. Capitalist ownership relations are another matter, indicted because they constitute a form of private power over people's lives. I reconstruct the ethical core of the democratic school and contend that it offers a better understanding of the most objectionable aspects of capitalist economies while avoiding the dangers inherent in the communitarian approach.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Market ExperiencePolitical Psychology, 1996
- The Communitarian Critique of LiberalismPolitical Theory, 1990
- The Political Theory of the Levellers: Putney, Property and Professor MacphersonPolitical Studies, 1976
- Lineages of the Absolutist StateThe American Historical Review, 1976
- Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval.The Philosophical Review, 1975
- Peasant Wars of the Twentieth CenturyAfrican Historical Studies, 1971
- Rural Economy and Country Life in the Medieval West.Population Studies, 1969
- WORK AND LEISURE IN PRE-INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY*Past & Present, 1964
- Work and Authority in IndustryThe American Catholic Sociological Review, 1958
- Ancient LawThe Crayon, 1861