On deriving sonority: a structural account of sonority relationships
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Phonology
- Vol. 9 (1) , 61-99
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001500
Abstract
In this paper, I examine sonority and place of articulation constraints on the syllabification of consonants in clusters. I argue that (i) both sonority and place of articulation relationships are important in determining the syllabification of consonants in clusters, (ii) well-formed sonority and place relationships are detectable both through phonotactics and through repair strategies that apply if the constraints on sonority and place are not met, (iii) sonority and place constraints are both structurally determined and (iv) place of articulation does not form part of the sonority relationship between consonants as the structural conditions for the licensing of sonority and for the licensing of place of articulation may differ (see Clements 1990a: 313). However, place of articulation restrictions, while independent of sonority restrictions, are, like sonority restrictions, structurally defined.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabificationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- ‘Coda’ licensingPhonology, 1990
- Segmental complexity and phonological governmentPhonology, 1990
- Atoms of segmental structure: components, gestures and dependencyPhonology, 1989
- On coronal transparencyPhonology, 1989
- Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese MimeticsLanguage, 1989
- Feature Geometry and Dependency: A ReviewPhonetica, 1988
- The Phonology of SelayareseOceanic Linguistics, 1986
- The geometry of phonological featuresPhonology Yearbook, 1985
- The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of charm and governmentPhonology Yearbook, 1985