Who Is Responsible for This?
- 16 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Aging & Social Policy
- Vol. 9 (2) , 51-65
- https://doi.org/10.1300/j031v09n02_05
Abstract
In the context of providing health and human services for older individuals, modern American culture often depends on formally asserting and battling over a clashing array of rights among respective combatants as a first resort at problem-solving. A substantial impediment exists in our cultural environment that discourages families and professionals, and the agencies that employ them, from recognizing and respecting the rights of older persons in a less adversarial and more subtle, sensitive, and flexible manner. This article discusses this barrier, illustrating it in several aging-related settings, and suggests a paradigm for addressing the situation. Then, several current challenges to the rethinking of rights and responsibilities in geriatric and gerontological practice are acknowledged.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Redefining Quality by Reassigning ResponsibilityAmerican Journal of Law & Medicine, 1994
- Philosophical Foundations of Respect for AutonomyKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1993
- Treatment Decisions for Terminally Ill Patients: Physicians' Legal Defensiveness and Knowledge of Medical LawLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1992
- Case Management: Ethical Pitfalls on the Road to High-Quality Managed CareQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1988
- Aging and Health: Effects of the Sense of ControlScience, 1986
- Autonomy and Paternalism: Two Goals in ConflictLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1985
- Induced Disability in Nursing Home Patients: A Controlled TrialJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1982