SMAD4 mutations in colorectal cancer probably occur before chromosomal instability, but after divergence of the microsatellite instability pathway
Open Access
- 31 July 2001
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 98 (17) , 9719-9723
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171321498
Abstract
Loss of chromosome 18q21 is well documented in colorectal cancer, and it has been suggested that this loss targets the DCC, DPC4/SMAD4, and SMAD2 genes. Recently, the importance of SMAD4, a downstream regulator in the TGF-β signaling pathway, in colorectal cancer has been highlighted, although the frequency of SMAD4 mutations appears much lower than that of 18q21 loss. We set out to investigate allele loss, mutations, protein expression, and cytogenetics of chromosome 18 copy number in a collection of 44 colorectal cancer cell lines of known status with respect to microsatellite instability (MSI). Fourteen of thirty-two MSI− lines showed loss of SMAD4 protein expression; usually, one allele was lost and the other was mutated in one of a number of ways, including deletions of various sizes, splice site changes, and missense and nonsense point mutations (although no frameshifts). Of the 18 MSI− cancers with retained SMAD4 expression, four harbored missense mutations in the 3′ part of the gene and showed allele loss. The remaining 14 MSI− lines had no detectable SMAD4 mutation, but all showed allele loss at SMAD4 and/or DCC. SMAD4 mutations can therefore account for about 50–60% of the 18q21 allele loss in colorectal cancer. No MSI+ cancer showed loss of SMAD4 protein or SMAD4 mutation, and very few had allelic loss at SMAD4 or DCC, although many of these MSI+ lines did carry TGFBIIR changes. Although SMAD4 mutations have been associated with late-stage or metastatic disease, our combined molecular and cytogenetic data best fit a model in which SMAD4 mutations occur before colorectal cancers become aneuploid/polyploid, but after the MSI+ and MSI− pathways diverge. Thus, MSI+ cancers may diverge first, followed by CIN+ (chromosomal instability) cancers, leaving other cancers to follow a CIN−MSI− pathway.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Functional consequences of tumorigenic missense mutations in the amino-terminal domain of Smad4Oncogene, 2000
- Role of Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling in CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Efficient TGF-β Induction of the Smad7 Gene Requires Cooperation between AP-1, Sp1, and Smad Proteins on the Mouse Smad7 PromoterJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
- Allelic loss at SMAD4 in polyps from juvenile polyposis patients and use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to demonstrate clonal origin of the epithelium.2000
- Mutations in the tumor suppressors Smad2 and Smad4 inactivate transforming growth factor β signaling by targeting Smads to the ubiquitin–proteasome pathwayProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
- Smad3 and Smad4 Mediate Transcriptional Activation of the Human Smad7 Promoter by Transforming Growth Factor βJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
- APC mutations in sporadic colorectal tumors: A mutational “hotspot” and interdependence of the “two hits”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
- Immunohistochemical Labeling for Dpc4 Mirrors Genetic Status in Pancreatic AdenocarcinomasThe American Journal of Pathology, 2000
- Comparative genomic hybridisationMolecular Pathology, 1999
- MADR2 Maps to 18q21 and Encodes a TGFβ–Regulated MAD–Related Protein That Is Functionally Mutated in Colorectal CarcinomaCell, 1996