Handwashing Compliance Depends on Professional Status
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Surgical Infections
- Vol. 2 (3) , 241-245
- https://doi.org/10.1089/109629601317202722
Abstract
Background: Nosocomial infections can be transmitted from microorganisms on the hands of health care workers to patients. Handwashing (HW) has a proven benefit in preventing transmission of infection, yet compliance with handwashing, especially in intensive care units, ranges between 28% and 74%. Methods: To determine if HW behavior varies as a function of health care professional status and patient interaction, we conducted an observational study of a surgical intermediate care unit in a large university teaching hospital. HW compliance was observed among all health care workers (HCW): physicians (MD; N = 46), nurses (RN; N = 295), and nursing support personnel (NSP; N = 93). Over an 8-week period, unidentified, trained observers documented all HCW interactions in 1-h random blocks. HW opportunities were classified into low and high risk of pathogen acquisition and transmission. Results: A total of 493 HW opportunities were observed, of which 434 involved MD, RN, and NSP. Two hundred and sixty-one low-risk (MD 35, RN 171, NSP 55) and 173 (MD 11, RN 124, NSP 38) high-risk interactions were observed. Overall HW rates were low (44%). Significant differences existed among HCW, with MDs being the least likely to wash (15% versus RN 50%, NSP 37%, p < 0.01). In adjusting for high-risk situations, MDs (odds ratio [OR] 5.58, 95% CI 2.49–12.54; NSP, OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13–2.64; RN, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77–1.23) were significantly less likely to perform HW when compared to RNs. Nursing groups were significantly less likely to wash in low-risk versus high-risk situations (MD 9.2% versus 17.1%; RN 69.4% versus 39.6%; NSP 85% versus 23.3%), suggesting individual discrimination of the importance of HW. Although nurses were less likely to wash in high-risk situations compared to NSP, the overall number of opportunities was greater, suggesting that improvement in HW to the level of NSP could have a major impact on infection transmission. Conclusion: Significant opportunities exist for quality improvement, novel educational strategies, and assessment of reasons why MDs and, to a lesser extent, RNs fail to follow simple HW practices.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Adherence to Hand Hygiene Practice: A Multidisciplinary ApproachEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2001
- No Time for Handwashing!? Handwashing Versus Alcoholic Rub Can We Afford 100% Compliance?Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1997
- The Role of Understaffing in Central Venous Catheter-Associated Bloodstream InfectionsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1996
- APIC guidelines for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settingsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1995
- Handwashing—the Semmelweis lesson forgotten?The Lancet, 1994
- A multicentre survey of hand hygiene practice in intensive care unitsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1994
- Epidemiology of Isolation PrecautionsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1991
- Hand-Washing Patterns in Medical Intensive-Care UnitsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing ScatterplotsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979