Predicting the growth and competitive effects of annual weeds in wheat
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Weed Research
- Vol. 30 (3) , 201-211
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1990.tb01704.x
Abstract
Summary: The growth and competitiveness of 12 annual weed species were studied in crops of winter wheat, in which weeds were sown to give a wide range of plant densities. Weed growth patterns were identified; early species which senesced in mid‐summer were less competitive than those with a growth pattern similar to that of the crop. Most species had little effect on crop yield in 1987, and this was attributed to a high crop den sity. Crop yield‐weed density relationships for all species in 1988 and for Galium aparine in 1987 were well described by a rectangular hyperbola. Species were listed in the following competitive order based on the percentage yield loss per weed m−2: Avena fatua > Matricaria perforata > Galium aparine > Myosotis arvenis > Poa trivialis > Alopecurus myosuroides > Stellaria media > Papaver rhoeas > Lamiumpur‐pureum > Veronica persica > Veronica hederi‐folia > Viola arvensis. Prediction of yield loss is discussed. The assumptions inherent in using Crop Equivalents (based on relative weights of weed and crop plants), are challenged; with intense competition, weed biomass at harvest failed to replace lost crop biomass, and harvest index was reduced. It is concluded that a competi tive index, derived from yield density relation ships, and expressed as the percentage yield loss per weed m−2, is more likely to reflect the com petitive ability of a species than an index obtained from plant weights in the growing crop.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A simple model relating yield loss to weed densityAnnals of Applied Biology, 1985
- Time of onset of competition and effects of various fractions of an Avena fatua L. population on spring barleyWeed Research, 1984
- An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 2. Marketable yield.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 1983