The role of data/code archives in the future of economic research
- 20 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Economic Methodology
- Vol. 15 (1) , 99-119
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780801915574
Abstract
This essay examines the role of data and program‐code archives in making economic research ‘replicable.’ Replication of published results is recognized as an essential part of the scientific method. Yet, historically, both the ‘demand for’ and ‘supply of’ replicable results in economics has been minimal. ‘Respect for the scientific method’ is not sufficient to motivate either economists or editors of professional journals to ensure the replicability of published results. We enumerate the costs and benefits of mandatory data and code archives, and argue that the benefits far exceed the costs. Progress has been made since the gloomy assessment of Dewald, Thursby and Anderson some 20 years ago in the American Economic Review, but much remains to be done before empirical economics ceases to be a ‘dismal science’ when judged by the replicability of its published results.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correction: Corrigendum: Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuriesNature, 2004
- Corrections to the Mann et. al. (1998) Proxy Data Base and Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature SeriesEnergy & Environment, 2003
- Care and feeding of reproducible econometricsJournal of Econometrics, 2001
- Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitationsGeophysical Research Letters, 1999
- THE TECHNOLOGICAL OBSOLESCENCE OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUDRationality and Society, 1996
- Remarks on my Term atJBESJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1993
- CommentSocial Epistemology, 1993
- CommentSocial Epistemology, 1993
- CommentSocial Epistemology, 1993
- The market for (ir)reproducible econometricsSocial Epistemology, 1993