Comparative Effectiveness of Nine Hypnotic Drugs: Sleep Laboratory Studies
- 1 April 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 17 (4) , 207-213
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009127007701700404
Abstract
The effectiveness of 9 hypnotic drugs [chloral hydrate, ethchlorvynol, flurazepam, glutethimide, methaqualone, secobarbital, GP41299 (N,N-dimethyldibenzo[b,d]thiepine-10-methylamine hydrochloride) and triazolam (U33030)] was compared [in insomniacs] using a standard protocol in separate sleep laboratory drug evaluation studies. All of the drugs were relatively effective in improving sleep with initial and short-term use. With intermediate-term use (2 wk), most of the drugs showed a marked decrease in their effectiveness. Following withdrawal, sleep was similar to baseline with most of the drugs, continued to be improved with flurazepam (Dalmane), 30 mg, and worsened beyond baseline levels with triazolam (U33030), 0.5 mg. The determination of a drug''s effectiveness with continued use was most important clinically in enabling the physician to rationally and effectively use hypnotic drugs in the adjunctive treatment of insomnia.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of intermediate‐term use of secobarbitalClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1976
- Hypnotic Efficacy of Triazolam: Sleep Laboratory Evaluation of Intermediate‐Term EffectivenessThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1976
- Shortcomings in the Evaluation and Promotion of Hypnotic DrugsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- Effectiveness of hypnotic drugs with prolonged use: Flurazepam and pentobarbitalClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1975
- INSOMNIA: AN APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENTPsychiatric Annals, 1974
- Hypnotic Drugs and Their EffectivenessArchives of General Psychiatry, 1970