A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Two Phone-Based Interventions on Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence
- 9 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Vol. 42 (3) , 294-303
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9291-z
Abstract
Background. Early-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer is associated with high survival rates; screening prevalence, however, remains suboptimal.PurposKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975‐2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future ratesCancer, 2009
- Patient and Physician Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer ScreeningJAMA Internal Medicine, 2009
- Ten Things that Motivational Interviewing Is NotBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2009
- Toward a theory of motivational interviewing.American Psychologist, 2009
- Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: A peek from the inside outPatient Education and Counseling, 2008
- The Impact of Consumer-Directed Health Plans and Patient Socioeconomic Status on Physician Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer ScreeningJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline From the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of RadiologyGastroenterology, 2008
- A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relativesPatient Education and Counseling, 2008
- Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: A meta-analytic reviewPreventive Medicine, 2007
- Perceptions of Colon Cancer Screening by Stage of Screening Test AdoptionCancer Nursing, 2007