Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal
- 17 March 2001
- Vol. 322 (7287) , 664-667
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7287.664
Abstract
Evidence based health care has become the accepted basis of good clinical practice, and many efforts are being made to implement it. Evidence based patient choice, defined as offering patients research based information and the opportunity to influence decisions about their treatment and care, has yet to achieve the same status. We believe, however, that it is fundamental to high quality patient care. In our ideal world difficult or controversial healthcare decisions would routinely involve health professionals deliberating with patients about the harms and benefits of all available options, as well as patients' treatment goals and risk tolerance. For key medical decisions, patients and doctors would expect to work through the evidence and decide on a course of action together. Patients who wished to delegate decision making to a doctor or surrogate decision maker would still be given the information that they wanted. Various strategies may be needed to achieve this widespread implementation of evidence based patient choice. 1 2 In this article we focus on a strategy to improve the accessibility of information resources to support evidence based patient choice. The books, journals, and websites that currently provide evidence based information about the effectiveness of healthcare interventions could provide the infrastructure to support patients' participation in evidence based decision making. These information sources should incorporate consumer focused summaries of relevant research evidence and links or pointers to well designed and tested decision aids for patients. These summaries should be made available to patients before, during, and after consultations. Doctors and health systems could use and distribute them as an adjunct to clinical care. They would also be available to the public generally. The news and information media, patient groups, and others would draw on patient choice summaries to present the benefits and limitations of medical screening and treatment. ### Summary points Evidence …Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementing shared decision‐making in routine practice: barriers and opportunitiesHealth Expectations, 2000
- Supporting and resourcing treatment decision-making: some policy considerationsHealth Expectations, 2000
- Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision AidsMedical Decision Making, 2000
- National electronic Library for Health (NeLH)BMJ, 1999
- Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic reviewBMJ, 1999
- Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making modelSocial Science & Medicine, 1999
- Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?BMJ, 1999
- Decision Aids for Patients Considering Options Affecting Cancer Outcomes: Evidence of Efficacy and Policy ImplicationsJNCI Monographs, 1999
- Managing demand: A patient led NHS: managing demand at the interface between lay and primary careBMJ, 1998
- Developing Shared Decision-Making Programs to Improve the Quality of Health CareQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1992