Inconsistencies in the theory of death threat
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Death Studies
- Vol. 10 (2) , 165-175
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07481188608252811
Abstract
Personal construct theory (1) suggests threat is experienced when a person develops constructs that are inferentially incompatible. Death threat theory (2, 3) has attempted to operationalize such inferential incompatibility by measuring the extent to which the self and death are described by different constructs. This paper argues that the death threat theory operationalization of inferential incompatibility is inappropriate and is not consistent with personal construct theory. Three major criticisms are made: a. the incompatibility of constructs is not measured, b. the theory advocates a form of cognitive simplicity, and c. the theory confounds the construction of life with the view of the self. The conclusion is that death threat theory is not consistent with personal construct theory.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Measure of the Integrative Complexity of Personal ConstructsJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1985
- An integrative analysis of two cognitive models of interpersonal effectivenessBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1977
- Impressions of a speaker as a function of set to understand or to evaluate, of cognitive complexity, and of prior attitudes1Published by Wiley ,1975
- The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1963