The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality
- 26 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 21 (2) , 303-307
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorReview of Educational Research, 1993
- Personality and Occupational Behavior: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Correlates of Managerial Practices in Two CulturesHuman Relations, 1993
- Folk Concepts, Natural Language, and Psychological Constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the Five‐Factor ModelJournal of Personality, 1993
- Can ipsative and single-item measures produce erroneous results in field studies of French and Raven's (1959) five bases of power? An empirical investigation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991
- COGNITIVE TRAILS IN STRATEGIC DECISION‐MAKING: LINKING THEORIES OF PERSONALITIES AND COGNITIONS*Journal of Management Studies, 1989
- From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
- Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q‐Set and the five‐factor modelJournal of Personality, 1986
- Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personalityPersonality and Individual Differences, 1985
- Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984
- Conceptual and empirical analysis of some assumptions of an explicitly typological theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984