The Parsing of Prosody
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Language and Cognitive Processes
- Vol. 11 (1-2) , 17-68
- https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387213
Abstract
Prosody has been demonstrated to play some role in parsing the grammatical structure of utterances of texts that might otherwise display surface (syntactic) ambiguity. In the context of this research, it is important to be able to state with reasonable certainty what the prosody of an utterance is. This paper considers the fact that the prosody is itself a grammatical (phonological) structure that mustbeparsed. First,prosodiccategories that determineor are marked by the intonational pattern are described for English and Japanese, concentrating on the categories “pitch accent” and tonally marked “phrases” at levels of the prosodic hierarchy above the (prosodic) word. Then various potential ambiguities in parsing these categories are discussed, with attention to both the phonological and the phonetic contexts which are most conducive to ambiguity between alternative prosodic parses, and to the implications of these ambiguities for claims about the relationship between prosody and syntax.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in EnglishJournal of Pragmatics, 1995
- The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- Automatic labeling of prosodic patternsIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 1994
- Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituencyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structurePhonology Yearbook, 1986
- On derived domains in sentence phonologyPhonology Yearbook, 1986
- Intonational structure in Japanese and EnglishPhonology Yearbook, 1986
- Implicating Uncertainty: The Pragmatics of Fall-Rise IntonationLanguage, 1985
- Binary Suprasegmental Features and Transformational Word-Accentuation RulesLanguage, 1972
- Contrastive Accent and Contrastive StressLanguage, 1961