Prioritization MICA
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
- Vol. 12 (2) , 161-169
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200603000-00008
Abstract
Although setting priorities is an important step in making public health policy, the benefit of using epidemiology to prioritize scarce public health resources has not been fully recognized. This situation is mostly due to the complexity of proposed models for setting priorities. We describe a public health priority setting model, Missouri Information for Community Assessment Priority Setting Model (Priority MICA), which uses epidemiologic measures available in most surveillance systems across the United States. Priority MICA uses data from birth and death certificates, hospital discharges, emergency departments, risk factors from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System, and eight epidemiologic measures to construct six priority criteria: size (the number of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths), severity (number of deaths of people younger than 65), urgency (trends in deaths and hospital morbidity), preventability (evidence-based score), community support (score of social support for preventive action), and racial-disparity (race comparison through death and morbidity rate ratio). Priority MICA is part of a Web-based interactive tool that makes available data from a wide variety of surveillance systems (http://www.dhss.mo.gov/MICA). The top 10 priority diseases determined by Priority MICA were compared to a more traditional method of ranking diseases by mortality rates. Using the additional criteria in Priority MICA identified four more priority diseases than were identified using just mortality while the ranking of the other six priority diseases differed between methods.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using burden of disease information for health planning in developing countries: the experience from UgandaSocial Science & Medicine, 2002
- The Missouri Experience in Providing Tools and Resources To Promote Community AssessmentJournal of Public Health Management & Practice, 2002
- Assessing the burden of disease and injury in Los Angeles County using disability-adjusted life yearsPublic Health Reports®, 2002
- Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makersHealth Policy, 2002
- Cost-utility analyses of clinical preventive services11The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000
- Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: what do different methods tell us?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- Limits to rationality: economics, economists and priority settingHealth Policy, 1999
- Priority setting in health care: learning from international experiencePublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Disease control priorities in developing countries: health policy responses to epidemiological change.American Journal of Public Health, 1991