Comparison of Bile Salt Perturbation of Duodenal and Jejunal Isolated Brush-Border Membranes
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Digestion
- Vol. 47 (4) , 200-207
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000200498
Abstract
Rabbit duodenal and jejunal brush-border membrane vesicle integrity, fluidity and passive proton permeability were studied after in vitro exposure to deoxycholate, glycodeoxycholate or taurodeoxycholate. Duodenal and jejunal membrane mean vesicle volume [0.54 (0.05) and 0.54 (0.03) μl/mg, mean values with SE in parentheses], and proton permeability [6.30 (0.20) × 10-4 and 5.59 (0.17) × 10-4 cm•S-1] were similar, while membrane fluidity was slightly, but significantly, greater in jejunal membranes [diphenylhexatriene fluorescence anisotropy, (r₀/r)-1 = 0.499 (0.013) and 0.572 (0.012)]. The three bile salts (0.1–5.0 mM) caused concentration-related decreases in vesicle integrity as assessed by [14C]glucose retention at equilibrium. Jejunal membranes were more sensitive at low bile salt concentrations, 0.1 and 0.5 mM. With high concentrations of bile salts, 5 mM, above their critical micelle concentration, less than 10% of jejunal or duodenal vesicles remained. The bile salts caused concentration-related increases in jejunal membrane fluidity over the range 0.1–1.0 mM bile salt, but duodenal membrane fluidity was only increased at the highest concentration of bile salt. Proton permeability (Pnet) of the membranes was increased by the bile salts (0.1–1.0 mM), and again the jejunal membranes were more sensitive; Pnet increased by approximately 120, 150 and 170 in duodenal, and 150, 220 and 380% in jejunal membranes, with deoxycholate at 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mM, respectively. There were no consistent differences in the potency of the unconjugated and conjugated bile salts. The three variables were only significantly correlated for duodenal membranes. The data demonstrate that physiological concentrations of bile salts have a direct effect on intestinal apical membrane properties, and that the duodenal membranes are more resistant. The cause of the relative resistance of duodenal membranes cannot be simply explained by their lower fluidity, and its physiological advantage abstruse.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A modified procedure for the rapid preparation of efficiently transporting vesicles from small intestinal brush border membranes. Their use in investigating some properties of d-glucose and choline transport systemsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Mechanism by which bile salt disrupts the gastric mucosal barrier in the dog.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1980
- Membrane lipid composition and susceptibility to bile salt damageBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1980
- A 1H-NMR investigation of the mechanism for the ionophore activity of the bile salts in phospholipid vesicular membranes and the effect of cholesterolBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1980
- BILE-ACIDS ARE NOT EQUALLY DAMAGING TO GASTRIC-MUCOSA1978
- The bile acid composition of rabbit and cat gall-bladder bileThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1977
- Effects of Anionic Surfactants on Hamster Small Intestinal Membrane Structure and Function: Relationship to Surface ActivityGastroenterology, 1977
- Fluorescence polarization studies of rat intestinal microvillus membranes.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1977
- Interaction of retinol and intestinal microvillus membranes studied by fluorescence polarizationBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1976
- A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye BindingAnalytical Biochemistry, 1976