Taking the Bishops Seriously
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 36 (4) , 527-554
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010185
Abstract
The U.S. Catholic bishops' pastoral letter on war and peace argues that nuclear deterrence is conditionally morally acceptable. Their concluding message is therefore not an exhortation to nuclear pacifism. The author argues, first, that the bishops' conditional moral acceptance of deterrence does not follow from their premises and the evidence presented to them; second, that this justification of deterrence, even if consistently arrived at, does not sanction current U.S. deterrence policy; third, that the conditions the bishops place on deterrence are incompatible with the type of deterrence they attempt to justify; and fourth, that there is no serious attempt currently being made to meet these conditions. The moral obligation that follows for those who take the bishops' principles seriously is nuclear conscientious objection.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The moral acceptability of nuclear deterrence: A critiquePolitics, 1983
- Defense Policy and the Reagan Administration: Departure from ContainmentInternational Security, 1983
- The Churches and Nuclear DeterrenceForeign Affairs, 1983
- Restarting Arms ControlForeign Policy, 1982
- Finishing StartForeign Policy, 1982
- Warming to the FreezeForeign Policy, 1982
- U.S. Strategic Forces: How Would They Be Used?International Security, 1982
- Nuclear DecapitationForeign Policy, 1981
- Some Paradoxes of DeterrenceThe Journal of Philosophy, 1978
- Flexible Madness?Foreign Policy, 1974