Pollinator–mediated selection on flower–tube length in a hawkmoth–pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae)
Open Access
- 22 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 269 (1491) , 631-636
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1928
Abstract
Darwin's mechanistic model whereby selection favours plants with flower tubes that exceed the tongue length of the primary pollinator, was tested using unmanipulated plants of the hawkmoth‐pollinated South African iris, Gladiolus longicollis. The study population was characterized by exceptionally large phenotypic variation in flower‐tube length (range 56–129 mm). Directional selection on tube length was revealed by a significant positive relationship between this trait and both fruit and seed set. Selection was attributed to the effect of tube length on pollen receipt, as supplemental hand pollinations showed fruit and seed set in the population to be pollen limited. Indirect selection on tube length may also occur through the correlation of this trait with inflorescence height, although direct selection on the latter trait was significant only for seed set. The main pollinators at the study site were individuals of the large hawkmoth Agrius convolvuli that had tongue lengths of 85–135 mm. Other hawkmoths had tongues that were much too short to reach the nectar in G. longicollis flowers and seldom carried pollen of G. longicollis. Flowers with tubes shorter than the tongues of A. convolvuli are apparently not effectively pollinated because stigmas do not contact the moth's head effectively. This study demonstrates that selection may occur among plants with natural phenotypic variation in flower‐tube length, and supports Darwin's model of pollinator‐mediated selection.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wildProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF POLLINATORS AND HERBIVORES: EVIDENCE FOR NON-ADDITIVITY IN A PERENNIAL HERBEcology, 2000
- Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systemsPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- PHENOTYPIC SELECTION IN HAWKMOTH-POLLINATEDPLATANTHERA BIFOLIA:TARGETS AND FITNESS SURFACESEvolution, 2000
- Why Do Flowers Vary?BioScience, 1999
- Mechanisms of Hummingbird‐Mediated Selection for Flower width in Ipomopsis AggregataEcology, 1996
- Selection on Floral Morphology and Environmental Determinants of Fecundity in a Hawk Moth‐Pollinated VioletEcological Monographs, 1993
- Statistical Data Analysis in the Computer AgeScience, 1991
- Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the “quantity” component in a plant-pollinator systemOecologia, 1989
- The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubesNature, 1988