Is meta-analysis a valid approach to the evaluation of small effects in observational studies?
Open Access
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 50 (3) , 223-229
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00360-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cohort Studies of Fat Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer — A Pooled AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st centuryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- The Risk of Ovarian Cancer after Treatment for InfertilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Alcoholic beverage consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis and reviewCancer Causes & Control, 1994
- Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: a meta-analysis.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Pooled analysis of 3 european case‐control studies: I. Reproductive factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 1991
- Dietary Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer: Combined Analysis of 12 Case--Control StudiesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- Evidence Favoring the Use of Anticoagulants in the Hospital Phase of Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- RESERPINE USE IN RELATION TO BREAST CANCERThe Lancet, 1974
- RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN USE OF RAUWOLFIA DERIVATIVES AND BREAST CANCER IN ENGLISH WOMENThe Lancet, 1974