Nitrate leaching from a sandy soil: the effect of previous crop and post-harvest soil management in an arable rotation
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- crops and-soils
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 127 (2) , 215-229
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002185960007800x
Abstract
SUMMARY: Agronomic practices can be modified to decrease autumn soil nitrate and nitrate leaching. This experiment aimed to measure the effectiveness of such practices when integrated into a farming system under UK conditions. The experiment started in autumn 1988 on a sandy soil in Nottinghamshire, UK, and comprised a four-course rotation of potatoes–cereal–sugarbeet–cereal. Three husbandry systems were superimposed, ranging from current commercial practice to most nitrate retentive. Plots were split further to receive either half or full recommended rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer. Soil mineral N (Nmin) and nitrate leaching (using porous ceramic cups) were measured on selected treatments; this paper presents the findings after five winters.Autumn Nmin and N leached were strongly influenced by the previous crop, consistently following the order potatoes > cereal > sugarbeet. Pre-harvest management (chiefly N fertilizer input) affected Nmin, and post-harvest management also modified N loss. Cover crops (winter rye or forage rape) after cereals removed 10–40 kg/ha N, depending on previous N management, time and method of establishment. They decreased leaching and were particularly effective if they were able to establish fully before significant drainage occurred. Nmin following sugarbeet, which had received 125 kg/ha N, was less after November lifting than after October lifting (16 and 28 kg/ha N, respectively, as amean of autumns 1989–92). Potatoes left most Nmin (a mean of 60 kg/ha for autumns 1989–92, receiving 220 kg/ha fertilizer N), and their late harvest gave little scope for decreasing leaching losses by establishing green cover before the start of winter. After late harvested root crops (both beet and potatoes), it was often preferable to leave the land fallow over winter, rather than ploughing and drilling a winter cereal.We show that nitrate leaching can be decreased by simple and inexpensive modifications to an existing crop rotation. Averaged over five winters, adopting such practices decreased the mean N concentration in drainage from 22·3 to 14·5 mg/1.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scope for more efficient use of fertilizer nitrogenSoil Use and Management, 1993
- Effects of previous crop, sowing date, and winter and spring applications of nitrogen on the growth, nitrogen uptake and yield of winter wheatThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1993
- Effects of field beans, fallow, lupins, oats, oilseed rape, peas, ryegrass, sunflowers and wheat on nitrogen residues in the soil and on the growth of a subsequent wheat cropThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1990
- Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate on soil nitrate nitrogen content after harvesting winter wheatThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1990
- Lysimeter Studies of Nitrogen Leaching and Nitrogen Balances as Affected by Agricultural PracticesActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, 1988
- Amounts of NO3-N and NH4-N in soil, from autumn to spring, under winter wheat and their relationship to soil type, sowing date, previous crop and N uptake at Rothamsted, Woburn and Saxmundham, 1979–85The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1987
- Role of Fine Roots in the Nitrogen Economy of Sugar BeetJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1987
- The dynamics of nitrogen uptake and its remobilization during the growth of sugar beetThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1986
- The effect of straw incorporation on the uptake of nitrogen by winter wheatJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1985
- Nitrogen Utilization by Wheat from Residual Sugarbeet Fertilizer and Soil Incorporated Sugarbeet Tops1Agronomy Journal, 1984