The Evolutionary Origin of Cooperators and Defectors
- 29 October 2004
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 306 (5697) , 859-862
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101456
Abstract
Coexistence of cooperators and defectors is common in nature, yet the evolutionary origin of such social diversification is unclear. Many models have been studied on the basis of the assumption that benefits of cooperative acts only accrue to others. Here, we analyze the continuous snowdrift game, in which cooperative investments are costly but yield benefits to others as well as to the cooperator. Adaptive dynamics of investment levels often result in evolutionary diversification from initially uniform populations to a stable state in which cooperators making large investments coexist with defectors who invest very little. Thus, when individuals benefit from their own actions, large asymmetries in cooperative investments can evolve.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift gameNature, 2004
- Escape from Prisoner’s Dilemma in RNA Phage Φ6The American Naturalist, 2003
- The Continuous Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Evolution of Cooperation through Reciprocal Altruism with Variable InvestmentThe American Naturalist, 2002
- Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods GamesScience, 2002
- The Continuous Prisoner's Dilemma: I. Linear Reactive StrategiesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1999
- Selfish Sentinels in Cooperative MammalsScience, 1999
- The Evolution of CooperationScience, 1981
- Why do organisms produce gametes of only two different sizes? Some theoretical aspects of the evolution of anisogamyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1979
- The Logic of Animal ConflictNature, 1973
- The Evolution of Reciprocal AltruismThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1971