Inaccuracies Inherent in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry In Vivo Bone Mineral Density Can Seriously Mislead Diagnostic/Prognostic Interpretations of Patient-Specific Bone Fragility
Open Access
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- perspective
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 16 (5) , 799-805
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.799
Abstract
Click on the article title to read more.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Perspective on the Causal Influence of Soft Tissue Composition on DXA‐Measured In Vivo Bone Mineral DensityJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Analytic and quantitative exposition of patient‐specific systematic inaccuracies inherent in planar DXA‐derived in vivo BMD measurementsMedical Physics, 1998
- Pitfalls in the Measurement of Bone Mineral Density by Dual Energy X-ray AbsorptiometrySpine, 1996
- Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1994
- Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femurCalcified Tissue International, 1994
- Effect of Fluoride Treatment on the Fracture Rate in Postmenopausal Women with OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- The error due to fat inhomogeneity in lumbar spine bone mineral measurementsClinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1989
- Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Dual Photon Absorptiometry for Bone Mineral Measurements of the Lumbar SpineMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1988
- Hip Fracture and the Use of Estrogens in Postmenopausal WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The effect of fat on bone mineral measurements in normal subjects with recommended values of bone, muscle and fat attenuation coefficientsClinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1987