Comparison of Catheter Surface Morphologies
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 65 (1) , 55-60
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14662.x
Abstract
The surface morphologies of different generic types of Foley catheter have been investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The characteristic features of each material are illustrated and it is shown that distinct differences exist between the inner and outer surfaces of latex-based catheters; these differences are attributed to the methods of manufacture. The possible relations between morphology and performance in situ are discussed.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of in vitro Encrustation on Silicone and Hydrogel‐coated Latex CathetersBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Effect of a hydrogel coating on the surface topography of latex-based urinary catheters: An SEM studyBiomaterials, 1987
- Urinary Catheter Structure and Testing Methods in Relation to Tissue ToxicityBritish Journal of Urology, 1986
- A Responsive Hydrogel as a Means of Preventing Calcification in Urological ProsthesesPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- The Role of Catheter Surface Morphology and Extractable Cytotoxic Material in Tissue Reactions to Urethral CathetersBritish Journal of Urology, 1983
- The Management of Indwelling CathetersBritish Journal of Urology, 1978
- Surface Structure of Unused and Used CathetersScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1977
- Synthetic Hydrogels for Biomedical ApplicationsPublished by American Chemical Society (ACS) ,1976