Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Eye
- Vol. 4 (5) , 712-717
- https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1990.100
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Binocular contrast sensitivity with monocular glare disabilityOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1990
- The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chartOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1990
- Contrast sensitivity in macular degeneration and the relation to subjective visual impairmentActa Ophthalmologica, 1989
- The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti‐cataract formulation trialsOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1988
- Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1987
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Contrast Sensitivity Function as a Diagnostic Tool in Low VisionOptometry and Vision Science, 1985
- Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1984
- Visual Factors and Orientation-Mobility PerformanceOptometry and Vision Science, 1982
- A CHANGE IN INDICATIONS FOR CATARACT SURGERY? A 10 YEAR COMPARATIVE EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDYActa Ophthalmologica, 1981