Identification of insulin resistance in Asian Indian adolescents: classification and regression tree (CART) and logistic regression based classification rules
- 31 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Endocrinology
- Vol. 70 (5) , 717-724
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03409.x
Abstract
Summary: Objective Biochemical measures for assessment of insulin resistance are not cost‐effective in resource‐constrained developing countries. Using classification and regression tree (CART) and multivariate logistic regression, we aimed to develop simple predictive decision models based on routine clinical and biochemical parameters to predict insulin resistance in apparently healthy Asian Indian adolescents.Design Community based cross‐sectional study.Subjects and patients Data of apparently healthy 793 adolescents (aged 14–19 years) were used for analysis. WHO's multistage cluster sampling design was used for data collection.Methods and measurements Homeostasis Model of Assessment value > 75th centile was used as cut‐off for defining the main outcome variable insulin resistance. CART was used to develop the decision tree models and multivariate logistic regression used to develop the clinical prediction score.Results Three classification trees and an equation for prediction score were developed and internally validated.The three decision trees were termed as CART I, CART II and CART III, respectively. CART I based on anthropometric parameters alone has sensitivity 88·2%, specificity 50·1% and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (aROC) 77·8%. CART II based on anthropometric and routine biochemical parameters has sensitivity 94·5%, specificity 38·3% and aROC 73·6%. CART III based on all anthropometric, biochemical and clinical parameters together has sensitivity 70·7%, specificity 79·2% and aROC 77·4%.Prediction score for insulin resistance = 1 × (waist circumference) + 1·1 × (percentage body fat) + 1·6 × (triceps skin‐fold thickness) – 1·9 × (gender). A score cut‐off of > 0 (using values marked for each) was a marker of insulin resistance in the study population (sensitivity 82·4%, specificity 56·7%, and aROC 73·4%).Conclusion These simple and cost‐effective classification rules may be used to predict insulin resistance and implement population based preventive interventions in Asian Indian adolescents.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose and insulin resistance syndrome in an urban Indian populationDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2003
- Relationship between obesity, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease riskPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- HOMA-Estimated Insulin Resistance Is an Independent Predictor of Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetic SubjectsDiabetes Care, 2002
- High prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in India: National Urban Diabetes SurveyDiabetologia, 2001
- Global Burden of Diabetes, 1995–2025: Prevalence, numerical estimates, and projectionsDiabetes Care, 1998
- Emerging Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease in Developing CountriesCirculation, 1998
- Insulin Resistance and Insulin Secretory Dysfunction as Precursors of Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus: Prospective Studies of Pima IndiansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human diseaseDiabetes, 1988
- Diabetes, hyperinsulinaemia, and coronary risk factors in Bangladeshis in east London.Heart, 1988
- MINMOD: a computer program to calculate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance testComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 1986