The Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliabilities of Prodromal Symptoms in First-Episode Psychosis
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 30 (4) , 498-504
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00048679609065023
Abstract
Objective: As part of the DSM-IV field trial for psychotic disorders, the authors endeavoured to determine the reliability of the DSM-IV prodromal features for schizophrenia in a first-episode sample. Method: Fifty first-episode psychotic patients were assessed using a semi-structured instrument to determine the presence/absence of nine prodromal symptoms. Inter-rater reliability data were calculated for 25 of the patients, and test-retest data were calculated for the remaining 25 patients. Results: Levels of reliability were poor. Conclusions: The results lend some support to American Psychiatric Association and World Health Organization decisions to omit specific criteria for prodromal features from their respective nosologies.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Prodromal Phase of First-episode Psychosis: Past and Current ConceptualizationsSchizophrenia Bulletin, 1996
- Psychoeducation in First-Episode Psychosis: A Therapeutic ProcessPsychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 1995
- Spurious precision: procedural validity of diagnostic assessment in psychotic disordersAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1995
- Prodromal Symptoms in SchizophreniaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1994
- Diagnosing Personality DisordersArchives of General Psychiatry, 1994
- Schizophrenia: The Characteristic SymptomsSchizophrenia Bulletin, 1991
- Royal Park Multidiagnostic Instrument for Psychosis: Part II. Development, Reliability, and ValiditySchizophrenia Bulletin, 1990
- Royal Park Multidiagnostic Instrument for Psychosis: Part I. Rationale and ReviewSchizophrenia Bulletin, 1990
- Diagnostic Criteria for SchizophreniaArchives of General Psychiatry, 1982
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960