GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH PRACTICE IN AUSTRALIA: NHMRC STATEMENT & PROFESSIONAL CODES
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Community Health Studies
- Vol. 13 (2) , 121-129
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1989.tb00188.x
Abstract
The guidelines for research practice with human participants offered in the National Health and Medical Research Council's ‘Statement on Human Experimentation and Supplementary Notes’ and a number of professions' Codes of Ethics were examined in terms of the principles of beneficence, respect for persons and justice. Clear differences emerged between the Professional Codes and the NHMRC Statement, particularly in the areas of confidentiality, reporting of research results and further use of data. The question of whether the NHMRC Statement is sufficiently comprehensive to guide research in many fields is considered.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The implications for Australia of the New ZealandReport of the cervical cancer inquiry:no cause for complacencyThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1989
- ETHICS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH: AUSTRALIAN DEVELOPMENTSCommunity Health Studies, 1988
- Fundamental ethical principles in health care.BMJ, 1987
- Ethics and Human ExperimentationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A shocking American report with lessons for all.BMJ, 1987
- Injuries to Research SubjectsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Ethics and Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966
- CONSENT IN CLINICAL EXPERIMENTATION: MYTH AND REALITYPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1966