On the Reliability of Meta-Analytic Reviews
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 17 (3) , 292-309
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9301700303
Abstract
The article addresses the issue of intercoder reliability in meta-analyses. The current practice of reporting a single, mean intercoder agreement score in meta-analytic research leads to systematic bias and overestimates the true reliability. An alternative approach is recommended in which average intercoder agreement scores or other reliability statistics are calculated within clusters of coded variables. These clusters form a hierarchy in which the correctness of coding decisions at a given level of the hierarchy is contingent on decisions made at higher levels. Two separate studies of intercoder agreement in meta-analysis are presented to assess the validity of the model.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision rules for selecting effect sizes in meta-analysis: A review and reanalysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Integrative reviews of nursing researchResearch in Nursing & Health, 1987
- Psychological effects of military service in Vietnam: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- Review of developments in meta-analytic method.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- The performance of endarterectomy for disease of the extracranial arteries of the head.Stroke, 1984
- Assessing the reliability of epidemiologic data obtained from medical recordsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research ReviewsReview of Educational Research, 1982
- Psychotherapy outcome: Smith and Glass' conclusions stand up under scrutiny.American Psychologist, 1982
- Organization and MemoryPsychology of Learning and Motivation, 1967