Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 7 (4) , 423-445
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400001101
Abstract
The choice of issues for debate is of central importance in any political system. By deciding what they will decide about, legislators also establish the terms and the most prominent participants in debate and, ultimately, the distribution of power and influence in the society. As Schattschneider has pointed out:Political conflict is not like an intercollegiate debate in which the opponents agree in advance on a definition of the issues. As a matter of fact, the definition of the alternatives is the supreme instrument of power; the antagonists can rarely agree on what the issues are because power is involved in the definition. He who determines what politics is about runs the country, because the definition of alternatives is the choice of conflicts, and the choice of conflicts allocates power.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conceptual Issues in the Study of InnovationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1976
- Some Economic Factors Affecting Safety in Underground Bituminous Coal MinesSouthern Economic Journal, 1974
- Ideas, Institutions and the Policies of Governments: a Comparative Analysis: Parts I and IIBritish Journal of Political Science, 1973
- The Learning of Legislative NormsAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Coal Mine Injury Rates in Two Eras of Federal ControlJournal of Economic Issues, 1973
- A Garbage Can Model of Organizational ChoiceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1972
- Politics, Policy, and Political Science: Theoretical AlternativesPolitics & Society, 1970
- Determinants of Innovation in OrganizationsAmerican Political Science Review, 1969
- IMA Is Not AloneJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1966