St John's wort for major depression
Top Cited Papers
- 8 October 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2008 (4) , CD000448
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000448.pub3
Abstract
Background In some countries extracts of the plant Hypericum perforatum L. (popularly called St. John's wort) are widely used for treating patients with depressive symptoms. Objectives To investigate whether extracts of hypericum are more effective than placebo and as effective as standard antidepressants in the treatment of major depression; and whether they have fewer adverse effects than standard antidepressant drugs. Search strategy Trials were searched in computerised databases, by checking bibliographies of relevant articles, and by contacting manufacturers and researchers. Selection criteria Trials were included if they: (1) were randomised and double-blind; (2) included patients with major depression; (3) compared extracts of St. John's wort with placebo or standard antidepressants; (4) included clinical outcomes assessing depressive symptoms. Data collection and analysis At least two independent reviewers extracted information from study reports. The main outcome measure for assessing effectiveness was the responder rate ratio (the relative risk of having a response to treatment). The main outcome measure for adverse effects was the number of patients dropping out due to adverse effects. Main results A total of 29 trials (5489 patients) including 18 comparisons with placebo and 17 comparisons with synthetic standard antidepressants met the inclusion criteria. Results of placebo-controlled trials showed marked heterogeneity. In nine larger trials the combined response rate ratio (RR) for hypericum extracts compared with placebo was 1.28 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10 to 1.49) and from nine smaller trials was 1.87 (95% CI, 1.22 to 2.87). Results of trials comparing hypericum extracts and standard antidepressants were statistically homogeneous. Compared with tri-or tetracyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), respectively, RRs were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.15; 5 trials) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.11; 12 trials). Both in placebo-controlled trials and in comparisons with standard antidepressants, trials from German-speaking countries reported findings more favourable to hypericum. Patients given hypericum extracts dropped out of trials due to adverse effects less frequently than those given older antidepressants (odds ratio (OR) 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.46) or SSRIs (OR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.34-0.83). Authors' conclusions The available evidence suggests that the hypericum extracts tested in the included trials a) are superior to placebo in patients with major depression; b) are similarly effective as standard antidepressants; c) and have fewer side effects than standard antidepressants. The association of country of origin and precision with effects sizes complicates the interpretation.This publication has 99 references indexed in Scilit:
- Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug AdministrationPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- The effect of St John’s wort extracts on CYP3A: a systematic review of prospective clinical trialsBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2006
- Hypericum Perforatum: A ???Modern??? Herbal AntidepressantClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Hypericum ExtractCNS Drugs, 1998
- The Effect of Hypericum Extract on Cardiac Conduction as seen in the Electrocardiogram Compared to that of ImipraminePharmacopsychiatry, 1997
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Clinical trial on Neurapas® versus placebo in patients with mild to moderate depressive symptoms: a placebo-controlled, randomised double-blind study Phase IV: Clinical trialComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 1994
- A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to ChangeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979