Error autocorrelation revisited: the AR(1) case
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Econometric Reviews
- Vol. 6 (2) , 285-294
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938708800137
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to consider the implicit restrictions imposed when adopting an AR(1) error term in the context of the linear regression model. It is shown that these restrictions amount to assuming a largely identical temporal structure for all the variables involved in the specification. Implicit in this is the assumption that these variables are mutually Granger non-causal. The main implication of this result is that in most cases when residual autocorrelation is detected boththe OLS and GLS estimators are biased and inconsistent.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Foundations of Econometric ModellingPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- The Interpretation of Test StatisticsCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1985
- ProbabilityPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- ExogeneityEconometrica, 1983
- Some Tests of Dynamic Specification for a Single EquationEconometrica, 1980
- An Empirical Application and Monte Carlo Analysis of Tests of Dynamic SpecificationThe Review of Economic Studies, 1980
- Serial Correlation as a Convenient Simplification, Not a Nuisance: A Comment on a Study of the Demand for Money by the Bank of EnglandThe Economic Journal, 1978
- Application of Least Squares Regression to Relationships Containing Auto- Correlated Error TermsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1949