After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition?
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Vol. 7 (10) , 425-427
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recognizing novel three–dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and viewsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objectsVision Research, 1999
- Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objectsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1995
- Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1993
- Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1992
- Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognitionCognitive Psychology, 1991
- Identification of Disoriented Objects: A Dual‐systems TheoryMind & Language, 1990
- Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognitionCognitive Psychology, 1989