Sensitivity of atmosphere–ocean heat exchange and heat content in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea
Open Access
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Stockholm University Press in Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
- Vol. 51 (4) , 526
- https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v51i4.13825
Abstract
A 3-d baroclinic coupled ice–ocean model, applied to the connected marginal seas, North Seaand Baltic Sea, was used to investigate the seasonal cycle of both heat content of the watercolumn and atmosphere–ocean heat exchange throughout the seasonal cycle. Case studies werecarried out to investigate, quantify and inter-compare the intra-annual sensitivity of the thermalstate of both marginal seas in response to changes in wind forcing, air temperature and freshwater runoff. The prescribed changes in model forcing were well within the range of the observedvariability. A simulation for a representative reference case (1984–84) served to quantifypredicted anomalies. Reducing the fresh water runoff for both seas by 30% resulted in asurprisingly small response in the heat content which was one order of magnitude smaller ascompared to the applied change in wind forcing. A reduction of the air temperature by 2°C causeda decrease of the heat content throughout the seasonal cycle in the order of 30%. In contrast to achange in air temperature a reduction of 30% in wind stress yielded distinct seasonal differencesin the oceanic response. The most significant wind induced changes occurred during autumn andwinter in the Baltic Sea and in the North Sea. A reduced wind forcing led to a larger oceanic heatcontent in winter as a consequence of a reduced winter convection and an intensification of thewinter thermocline in the freshwater dominated Baltic. In the Baltic Proper, with its perennialthermo-haline stratification, predicted temperature changes of intermediate waters were severaltimes higher than sea surface temperature changes. Compared with the North Sea, the Balticshowed a much higher sensitivity in response of the heat content to changes in the wind forcing.However, the opposite is true for the heat flux from the water to the atmosphere during the coolingperiod. Here the sensitivity of the North Sea is much higher than that of the Baltic Sea. This iscaused by the fact that advective heat flux changes and atmospheric heat flux changes are workingin the same direction in the Baltic Sea and acting in opposite direction in the North Sea. Resultsof this sensitivity study suggest that future studies on an inter-annual sensitivity should be conductedwith a coupled atmosphere–ocean model. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0870.1992.00006.xKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thermohaline stratification and instabilities at tidal mixing fronts: results of an eddy resolving model for the German BightContinental Shelf Research, 1997
- Development of a spring thermocline at temperatures below the temperature of maximum density with application to the Baltic SeaJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1997
- Simulating the heat storage in the North Sea with a three-dimensional circulation modelContinental Shelf Research, 1996
- Predicting the thermocline in a circulation model of the North sea — part I: model description, calibration and verificationContinental Shelf Research, 1996
- Climate-sensitivity of European marginal seas, derived from the interpretation of modelling studiesJournal of Marine Systems, 1996
- Statistical downscaling of monthly mean North Atlantic air-pressure to sea level anomalies in the Baltic SeaTellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 1996
- Response of Baltic Sea ice to seasonal, interannual forcing and climate changeTellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 1996
- Bulk models of solar radiation at seaQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1988
- A Model for the Exchange of Water and Salt Between the Baltic and the SkagerrakJournal of Physical Oceanography, 1983
- An ice drift model for the Baltic SeaTellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 1981