How Useful Is Quantitative Risk Assessment?
Top Cited Papers
- 22 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 24 (3) , 515-520
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00455.x
Abstract
This article discusses the use of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) in decision making regarding the safety of complex technological systems. The insights gained by QRA are compared with those from traditional safety methods and it is argued that the two approaches complement each other. It is argued that peer review is an essential part of the QRA process. The importance of risk‐informed rather than risk‐based decision making is emphasized. Engineering insights derived from QRAs are always used in combination with traditional safety requirements and it is in this context that they should be reviewed and critiqued. Examples from applications in nuclear power, space systems, and an incinerator of chemical agents are given to demonstrate the practical benefits of QRA. Finally, several common criticisms raised against QRA are addressed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Columbia Disaster Underscores the Risky Nature of Risk AnalysisScience, 2003
- Use of Technical Expert Panels: Applications to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis*Risk Analysis, 1998
- Probabilistic safety assessment development in the United States 1972–1990Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1993
- Human ErrorPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final reportPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,1983
- On The Quantitative Definition of RiskRisk Analysis, 1981
- Risk Assessment Review Group report to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. [PWR; BWR]Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,1978