Performance management using health outcomes: in search of instrumentality
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 4 (4) , 359-362
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.tb00099.x
Abstract
The past decade has seen the growing use of performance data in the hope of bringing about quality improvements in health care. Most recently, an emphasis on health outcomes (and especially mortality rates) has led to much activity around collecting and publishing such data. Two major problems intervene. What meanings can be ascribed to reported health outcomes? And what impacts are they likely to have on clinical performance? Much empirical work supports the assertion that reported outcomes may be poor indicators of service quality. In addition, the impact of these data may be small or even detrimental unless great care is made to connect the reporting with explicit quality-improving actions.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trust in performance indicators?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1998
- Interpreting health outcomesJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1997
- Promoting efficiency in the NHS: problems with the labour productivity indexBMJ, 1996
- Identifying Poor-Quality HospitalsMedical Care, 1996
- Benefits and Hazards of Reporting Medical Outcomes PubliclyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1995
- Performance Reports on Quality -- Prototypes, Problems, and ProspectsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sectorInternational Journal of Public Administration, 1995
- Joint Commission will collect, publicize outcomesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- The Outcomes Movement — Will It Get Us Where We Want to Go?New England Journal of Medicine, 1990