Paraplegia following thoracic aortic cross-clamping in dogs. No difference in neurological outcome with a barbiturate versus isoflurane.
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 24 (10) , 1554-1559
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.10.1554
Abstract
We compared the incidence and severity of paraplegia following thoracic aortic cross-clamping in dogs for two anesthetic regimens. Animals were randomly assigned to receive methohexital (group M; n = 9) or isoflurane (group I; n = 9). We expected a better neurological outcome in animals administered methohexital because of superior neuronal protection and greater spinal cord perfusion pressure (mean arterial pressure below the cross-clamp site minus mean cerebrospinal fluid pressure). After surgical preparation and a 30-minute stabilization period, dogs in group M received 14 +/- 6 mg.kg-1 i.v. methohexital to induce an isoelectric electroencephalogram followed by a continuous infusion of methohexital at 20 mg.kg-1 x h-1. Dogs in group I received 1.4 +/- 0.2% end-tidal isoflurane (1 minimum alveolar concentration). The thoracic aorta was then occluded 2.5 cm distal to the left subclavian artery for 30 minutes and then released. Hemodynamics and cerebrospinal fluid pressure were measured at (1) baseline, (2) 2 minutes after aortic cross-clamping, (3) 20 minutes after aortic cross-clamping, (4) 5 minutes after aortic unclamping, and (5) 30 minutes after resuscitation. At 24 hours a neurological assessment was performed. After the clinical assessment the dogs were killed and the spinal cord removed immediately for histopathologic study. There were no differences in nasopharyngeal temperature, PaCO2, pH, or hemoglobin at any time between groups. With cross-clamping, the spinal cord perfusion pressure decreased precipitously. However, there was no difference in spinal cord perfusion pressure between groups at any time (P = .5555). The neurological outcome, assessed at 24 hours after thoracic aortic cross-clamping by a veterinarian unaware of the anesthetic protocol, was not different between groups (P > .5, two-tailed Mann-Whitney rank-sums test). When anesthetized with methohexital 5 of 9 dogs were paraplegic; with isoflurane 7 of 9 dogs were paraplegic. By Spearman's rank test, a strong inverse correlation between the Tarlov score and the ratio of dead to total lumbar anterior spinal cord neurons was seen (Spearman's correlation coefficient = -.8358; P = .0001). We conclude that no advantage was offered by the choice of anesthesia to neurological outcome after 30 minutes of thoracic aortic cross-clamping in this canine model.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Proximal Aortic Hypertension after Thoracic Aortic Cross-clamping in Dogs Phlebotomy versus Sodium Nitroprusside/IsofluraneAnesthesiology, 1992
- Protecting the Ischemic Spinal Cord During Aortic ClampingAnnals of Surgery, 1992
- A Comfortable Hypothesis Reevaluated Cerebral Metabolic Depression and Brain Protection during IschemiaAnesthesiology, 1992
- Reversible Focal Ischemia in the Rat: Effects of Halothane, Isoflurane, and Methohexital AnesthesiaJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 1991
- Phlebotomy Reverses the Hemodynamic Consequences of Thoracic Aortic Cross-clampingAnesthesiology, 1991
- Comparison of Methohexital and Isoflurane on Neurologic Outcome and Histopathology Following Incomplete Ischemia in RatsAnesthesiology, 1990
- Effect of sodium nitroprusside on spinal cord perfusion and paraplegia during aortic cross-clampingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- Comparison of the Effects of Isoflurane and Thiopental on Neurologic Outcome and Neuropathology after Temporary Focal Cerebral Ischemia in PrimatesAnesthesiology, 1988
- A Comparison of the Cerebral Protective Effects of Isoflurane and Barbiturates during Temporary Focal Ischemia in PrimatesAnesthesiology, 1987
- Barbiturate protection in acute experimental spinal cord ischemiaJournal of Neurosurgery, 1982