Quality-of-Life Measurements for Patients Taking Which Drugs?
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in PharmacoEconomics
- Vol. 7 (2) , 141-151
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199507020-00006
Abstract
Of the many publications on quality of life in medicine over the last 2 decades, only a minor fraction have been devoted to drug trials. The most frequently investigated are classes of drugs within cancer disorders, hypertension and depressive illness. Health-related quality-of-life (QOL) measurements are typically applied in chronic or subchronic disorders where the balance between effectiveness (disease-modifying drug effects) and safety (adverse drug reactions) are assessed by patients in terms of subjective well-being. In this context, quality of life is an attempt to help the doctor to listen to his or her patient. The components of QOL measurements are to be found within the PCASEE model where: P = physical indicators; C = cognitive indicators; A = affective indicators; S = social indicators; E = economic-social stressors or negative life events; and E = ego function or personality problems. Most variance in QOL measurements arises through operating in the cognitive (e.g. lack of control, concentration difficulties) or affective (e.g. depressed mood or anxiety) components. The most specific component is, of course, adverse drug reactions, which are typically gastrointestinal symptoms in cancer therapies, and circulatory symptoms and sexual function with antihypertensive drugs. However, the affective and cognitive components also have different weights within subclasses of drugs, such as antihypertensive agents. Thus, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors act on the affective component (depression and anxiety) and calcium channel blockers on the cognitive component (neurasthenia). In general, patients with cancer or hypertension give more reliable assessments of their cognitive and affective symptoms than their doctors do, while patients with primary depression are less reliable than their doctors or relatives in measuring changes in the affective components of their illness when they are ill. Health-related QOL measurements have not only an impact on the doctor-patient relationship but also involve a holistic approach to drug treatment, by checking all the PCASEE components.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The borderline syndromes of depression, mania and schophrenia: the coaxial or temperamental approachActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1994
- The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.1992
- [Quality of life of patients with small cell lung cancer can be improved by treatment with cytostatic agents].1992
- The Hamilton Scales and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL–90)The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1992
- Quality of life, side effects and efficacy of lisinopril compared with metoprolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.1991
- The effect of supportive pamidronate treatment on aspects of quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Valuation of health states by the general public: Feasibility of a standardized measurement procedureSocial Science & Medicine, 1990
- Quality of Life in Psychosomatic ResearchPsychopathology, 1987
- The Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy on the Quality of LifeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The social readjustment rating scaleJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1967