Some factors affecting reproducibility in ultrasonic scanning of animals 1. Cattle
- 1 December 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Animal Science
- Vol. 15 (3) , 239-249
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100011491
Abstract
SUMMARY Six Hereford and Shorthorn cross steers were ultrasonically scanned in parallel planes perpendicular to the spine. Scanning was performed at the level of each vertebra and extended from the head of the 9th rib to the articulation of the 3rd and 4th lumbar vertebrae. Scans of each live animal were compared with those of its hot carcass and related to dissected sections of the frozen carcass. In general, the difference between an ultrasonic estimate and the carcass measurement was found to depend on the anatomical parameter being investigated, the location on the animal at which measurement was made and the individual interpreting the scan. Results are presented for fat thickness, Mm. longissimi thoracis et lumborum depth, ‘A’, ‘B’ and area measurements. Possible explanations for some discrepancies between the ultrasonic and carcass measurements are discussed. Additional results showed that whilst judges are consistent within themselves, in general their interpretations of ultrasonic scans differ significantly from each other.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasonic Application for Estimating Fat Thickness of Beef CattleJournal of Animal Science, 1970
- Predicting Body Tissue Characteristics Using Ultrasonic TechniquesJournal of Animal Science, 1967
- A Comparison of Ultrasonic Estimates of Rib-Eye Area and Fat Thickness in CattleJournal of Animal Science, 1966
- Ultrasonic Estimates of Fat Thickness and Longissimus Dorsi Area in LambsJournal of Animal Science, 1965