The Performance Appraisal Process: A Model and Some Testable Propositions
- 1 July 1978
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 3 (3) , 635-646
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305904
Abstract
A literature-based model of the determinants of the accuracy of performance ratings is presented. The model indicates that the major determinants of accuracy are: (a) rater motivation; (b) rater ability; and (c) availability of appropriate judgmental norms. Several propositions and suggestions for further research are derived from the components of the model.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- An analysis of the external validity and applied relevance of three rating formatsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977
- Effects of rater training and diary-keeping on psychometric error in ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Effect of applicant's sex, race, and performance on employers' performance ratings: Some additional findings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approachOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974
- Evaluation of Male and Female Ability: Bias Works Two WaysPsychological Reports, 1973
- The development and evaluation of behaviorally based rating scales.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
- A DIFFERENTIAL PREDICTION MODEL TO MODERATE THE EFFECTS OF HETEROGENEOUS GROUPS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION AND CLASSIFICATION1Personnel Psychology, 1969
- Influence of training, method, and relationship of the halo effect.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968
- A Note on Supervisor Ratings1Personnel Psychology, 1966
- The influence of the Supervisor'S Requirements on Ratings1Personnel Psychology, 1966