Comparison of seven coagulase tests for identification ofStaphylococcus aureus
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 6 (5) , 589-591
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02014257
Abstract
Four coagglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus were compared with the ordinary slide and tube coagulation tests using two groups of staphylococcal strains (one isolated in the authors' laboratory and the other identified by a reference laboratory). The correct identification rate in the two groups was respectively for slide test 96.9 % and 92.7 %, tube coagulation (citrate plasma) 99.0 % and 94.8%, tube coagulation (EDTA plasma) 99.0% and 91.7%, API Staphase III 100% and 91.7%, Staph Rapid 97.9% and 91.3%, Staphyslide 99.0% and 94.6 %, Staphaurex 96.9 % and 92.7 %. The sensitivity of Staph Rapid, Staphyslide and Staphaurex was slightly higher than that of the other tests. These three tests and the slide test were considerably more rapid as regards identification than the other tests.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of rapid coagulase methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1986
- Evaluation of various rapid agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1985
- Evaluation of three commercial agglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1984
- An Evaluation of Three Rapid Coagglutination Tests: Sero- STAT®, Accu-Staph™, and Staphyloslide™, for Differentiating Staphylococcus aureus from Other Species of StaphylococciAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984