Validation of a new formula for mean arterial pressure calculation: The new formula is superior to the standard formula
- 22 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 63 (4) , 419-425
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20217
Abstract
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) has traditionally been derived from systolic and diastolic pressures, weighted 1/3 systolic and 2/3 diastolic. No correction is made for the increasing time dominance of systole with increasing heart rates. In a previous study, we developed a new and more accurate heart rate‐corrected MAP formula from central aorta pressure determinations in a large number of patients: MAP = DP + [0.33 + (HR × 0.0012)] × [PP] where SP and DP are systolic and diastolic pressure and HR is heart rate. The current study validates the new MAP formula in the same patient at increasing paced heart rates. A central aorta catheter was used to obtain computer‐determined systolic, diastolic, and MAP in 12 patients. Values were obtained at baseline and then at increasing right atrial paced heart rates. The new and standard MAP formula‐derived values were compared with computer‐determined values. The new formula showed a much closer correlation with the computer‐derived values for MAP. Standard MAP calculations for MAP can easily be improved by inclusion of a heart rate factor. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:419–425.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heart rate and pulse pressure amplification in hypertensive subjectsAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 2003
- A Comparison of Outcomes with Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitors and Diuretics for Hypertension in the ElderlyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Formula and nomogram for the sphygmomanometric calculation of the mean arterial pressureHeart, 2000
- A Comparison of the Indirect Estimate of Mean Arterial Pressure Calculated by the Conventional Equation and Calculated to Compensate for a Change in Heart RateInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2000
- Validity of predicting mean arterial blood pressure during exerciseMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1999
- Evaluation of Five QT Correction Formulas Using a Software-Assisted Method of Continuous QT Measurement from 24-Hour Holter RecordingsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Calculation of Mean Arterial Pressure During Exercise as a Function of Heart Rate.Applied Human Science, 1995
- Intra-arterial and cuff blood pressure responses during incremental cycle ergometryMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1988
- Evaluation of 10 QT prediction formulas in 881 middle-aged men from the seven countries study: Emphasis on the cubic root Fridericia's equationJournal of Electrocardiology, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986